by Richard Bird

Sometimes (wink, wink, nudge, nudge, say no more) it’s difficult to get decision-makers to focus on the big-picture and to avoid the distraction of details. This is especially true early in strategy or concept development.
Here are some suggestions:
# Spread all the concepts out. Set aside those that connect based on your first, gut instinct. Move quickly.
# Set aside those that, instinctively, don’t seem right. (The “include” method is preferred - as in option 1.)
# Group concepts by any agreed similarity or other criteria. Choose standouts from any group.
# Group concepts by purely visual themes. Choose one standout design from any group.
# Use the “Eye Doctor” method. Go two-by-two and decide which one is “Better or Worse,” “Better or Worse.” Only the “Better” moves forward to the next comparison. Think on your feet.
# Use comparisons to facilitate feedback with simple language and visual support. “Concept X is a winner, but it needs to say ‘spectacular’ more strongly… like concept Y does.” Consider the ideas eliminated by other methods, too.
# Score each concept on rating scale(s) of your choosing. Compile total scores. Three or more participants.
There are 1 comments so far | Post a comment
Comment Notice:
R.BIRD & Company, Inc. reserves the right to monitor content posted on the Service, and to modify or remove any messages or postings that it deems, in its sole discretion, to be abusive, defamatory, in violation of the copyright, trademark right, or other intellectual property right of any third party, or otherwise inappropriate for the Service. Notwithstanding the foregoing, R.BIRD is not obligated to take any such actions, and will not be responsible or liable for content posted by any subscriber in any forum, message board, or other area within the Service.
Richard Bird said:
Case: In one of our own projects, we had presented more than 60 concepts (already reduced from hundreds) for consideration.
The client recognized the potential. But, decisions on which direction to go next was divided into committees of interest.
So, we had a half dozen stakeholders - some informed, some completely uninformed - looking at 60 valid possibilities.
These stakeholders were at remote locations and not connected to each other on a daily basis. Not unusual.
R.BIRD initiated a conference call and began to employ the principles noted.
In less than 30 minutes, we facilitated total agreement on brand strategy and commitment from all stakeholders considering a field of 60 greater possibilities.